![]() ![]() The more prominent houses (tun) and the majority of the Armenian nobility obviously accepted their status of service (caṙayut‛iwn) and supported imperial measurements as the recruitment of Armenian troops for the war on the Balkans. It should become evident that the repeated insurrections against Byzantine and Sasanian authorities described in Sebēos may not shape our picture of these decade too much, because their protagonists, targets and achievements were of minor relevance within the framework of Armeno-Byzantine-Sasanian relations. conceded the larger part of Persarmenia to emperor (kaysr) Maurikios, until the emperor’s fall in 602. This article concentrates on the first period of direct Byzantine rule over most of Armenia after the treaty of 591, when Xusrō II. ![]() Thomson and Tim Greenwood in the last years have created a more realistic picture of the quality and reliability of the Armenian History attributed to Sebēos, it is still one of our most valuable sources for the history of Armenia, the neighbouring regions and the relationship between Byzantium and the Sasanian Empire in the late 6th and early 7th century. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |